Conversation
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideThis PR updates several documentation markdown files to use root-relative (absolute-from-site-root) paths instead of relative paths for internal links and images, improving link robustness across different rendering contexts. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- Switching to root-relative links (e.g.
/diff_reporters.csv) may break navigation when viewing the Markdown directly on GitHub or outside the built docs site, since/...resolves to the domain root rather than the repository root; consider whether repo-relative (../../...) or site-relative paths (via the docs generator config) are more appropriate for your use cases. - The updated link in
mob-sessions-retros/2023-09-17...mdpoints to/docs/how_to/verify_both_logs_and_results.md; double-check that this path resolves correctly in whichever context this retrospective is consumed (GitHub vs generated site), as it previously relied on a relative path into../docs.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Switching to root-relative links (e.g. `/diff_reporters.csv`) may break navigation when viewing the Markdown directly on GitHub or outside the built docs site, since `/...` resolves to the domain root rather than the repository root; consider whether repo-relative (`../../...`) or site-relative paths (via the docs generator config) are more appropriate for your use cases.
- The updated link in `mob-sessions-retros/2023-09-17...md` points to `/docs/how_to/verify_both_logs_and_results.md`; double-check that this path resolves correctly in whichever context this retrospective is consumed (GitHub vs generated site), as it previously relied on a relative path into `../docs`.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: